🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that could add up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters according to their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries established after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a national fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of more conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG welcomed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic officials criticized the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A top House leader said the court had once again shredded its credibility by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.